The Virginia Coalition for Open Government  
FOI Blog
Not taking no for an answer PDF Print E-mail

(Posted 8/28/2009 by Megan Rhyne)

Recent FOIA "end-runs" show why a response of "no" to a request for records doesn't always put an end to the matter.

Most recently, a homeowners' association for a neighborhood in both York County and Newport News asked both governments for certain records related to a zoning decision affecting the neighborhood. The association got most of what it sought from York County, and some of those records were communications with Newport News officials. Yet, when asked for the records from Newport News, those NN-York County communications weren't included. What else might have been excluded, either inadvertently or deliberately? Alan Albert of LeClair Ryan is representing the association in its FOIA case against Newport News.

A few weeks ago, Gov. Kaine refused to release past travel records, invoking the "working papers" exemption. It was a legitimate use of the exemption, but exemptions are discretionary, and given the realities of that moment (Kaine's pledge to keep DNC expenses separate from state ones, and revelations thru travel records that S.C. governor wasn't always where he said he was), he didn't have to use it.

So, Bob Lewis at the Associated Press went to the State Police.

They're not eligible for the working papers exemption and ended up releasing records related to their security detail for the governor. With a lttle more research and some cross-referencing, Lewis could piece together where the governor had been.

In the recent flap about Del. Phil Hamilton's employment at and funding work in behalf of ODU's learning center, Hamilton would have been able to invoke the working papers exemption, too, if asked to produce e-mails. So, reporters at the Daily Press asked non-working-papers-eligible ODU officials for their e-mails, which they generally had to produce. The e-mails revealed Hamilton & ODU had indeed considered Hamilton's employment before he sought funding.

Citizens in Westmoreland County have filed suit against the county for saying it had no records responsive to the citizens' FOIA request for records relating to a controversial land deal. How could such an expensive, controversial and complicated deal not generate any records, they asked. The case is still pending.

  

 

Add comment

Security code
Refresh

Making Your FOIA Life Easier

A seminar for state and local records managers at the Library of Virginia
800 E. Broad St., Richmond
Thursday, May 30, 2013
9:00 - 12:00
$15/person

Click here for a paper registration form OR
register below
(note: you do NOT need a PayPal account to use the PayPal payment page)

 

How many people are you registering?
Name(s) of those registering
Government agency/department

Comment on This Post

You can now comment on this post and other posts in the FOI blog. Scroll down for details

About the FOI Blog

Check out our blog for updates on VCOG's work, upcoming events, news and commentary.

Show most recent blog posts
List/search blog posts

Upcoming Events

  • May 20 FOIA Council Subcommittee on Rights & Responsibilities
  • May 20 FOIA Council Subcommittee on Electronic Meetings
  • May 30 Making Your FOIA Life Easier - a records management seminar

How Many Clicks?

VCOG surveyed all 134 Virginia counties and independent cities and asked,
"How many clicks does it take to get to your local budget?"
Now, click the owl and find out how YOUR locality ranked.

owl116RGB

Drive your open government pride

Show your FOIA pride!
Get the new FOIA car magnet.
$5/each

foia

Buy a magnet, become a member

Looking for federal FOIA info?

Click here for a primer on federal FOIA prepared by the Justice Department.