|
June 6, 2001
Mr. Kevin M. Cusce
Yorktown, Virginia
The staff of the Freedom of
Information Advisory Council is authorized to issue advisory
opinions. The ensuing staff advisory opinion is based solely upon
the information presented in your letters of April 2 and April 14,
2001.
Dear Mr. Cusce:
You have asked whether you may obtain copies of the records
maintained in your case file by the Board of Social Work ("the
Board") under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). You
indicate in your correspondence that Board has placed you under
probationary supervision, but you do indicate any background
details that led to your probationary status. You have requested
records pertaining to your case from both the Board and the
Department of Health Regulatory Boards, which oversees the Board,
pursuant to both FOIA and the Privacy Protection Act of 1976 (PPA).
Your request was denied on the grounds that § 54.1-2400.2 of
the Code of Virginia requires all information obtained during an
investigation or disciplinary hearing of a health regulatory board
be kept confidential. You challenge the application of the
exemption on the grounds that it was meant to protect the privacy
of the individual named in the investigation, and thus was not
meant to prohibit access to the information by the subject
himself.
Subsection A of § 2.1-342 states that [e]xcept as
otherwise specifically provided by law, all public records shall be
open to inspection and copying by any citizens of the
Commonwealth. While FOIA sets forth a number of exemptions to
this requirement at § 2.1-342.01, exemptions can also be found
at other locations throughout the Code. One such example is §
54.1-2400.2, which prohibits the disclosure of [a]ny reports,
information or records received and maintained by any health
regulatory board in connection with possible disciplinary
proceedings, including any material received or developed by a
board during an investigation or proceeding. Because the
documents that you request relate to an investigation by the Board
of Social Work, a health regulatory board, into the status of your
license and subsequent probation, these records clearly fall within
the purview of the exemption. While most of the exemptions set
forth in FOIA give the records custodian discretion as to whether
to exercise the exemption and withhold the records, this provision
sets forth a clear prohibition against disclosure. Subsection H of
§ 54.1-2400.2 makes it a Class 1 misdemeanor for any person to
disclose the investigative and disciplinary records.
You argue that despite the clear prohibition against disclosure,
the policy of the exemption is to protect the privacy of the
individual subject to the investigation, and thus should not be
interpreted as to allow a board to withhold records from the
subject of those records. Therefore, you argue, you are entitled to
receive a copy of the records concerning your license, and the
exemption should be used only to prohibit the dissemination of the
records to a third party. The rules of statutory construction do
not support your argument, as will be discussed below.
Generally, a "data subject" does have a right to access
information gathered about him by an "agency," as these terms are
defined at § 2.1-379 of PPA. Subdivision A. 3. of §
2.1-382 of PPA gives a data subject the right to inspect all
personal information maintained by a given agency, and be informed
of the source of the information and the names of recipients of
this information. However, subsection 1 of § 2.1-384 declares
that PPA is not applicable to information [m]aintained by
agencies concerning persons to be licensed by law in this
Commonwealth to engage in the practice of any professional
occupation. Because you are required to be licensed by the
Board to engage in the practice of social work, the information
gathered about you by the Board is not be subject to the
requirements of PPA.
In addition, subsection A of § 54.1-2400.2 enumerates six
situations under which information concerning investigations or
disciplinary hearings may be disclosed. None of these six make any
mention of disclosure of the records to an individual who is the
subject of those records. The absence of such an exception to the
list indicates a legislative intent to withhold such records from
the subject, since disclosure under other circumstances is
affirmatively permitted.
Finally, in certain instances the statutes allowing records to
be witheld pursuant to FOIA also specifically require that these
same records be made available to the individual who is the subject
of those records. For example, subsection A. 4. of §
2.1-342.01 exempts [p]ersonnel records containing information
concerning identifiable individuals, except that access shall not
be denied to the person who is the subject thereof. Similar
provisions can be found within other FOIA exemptions at §
2.1-342.01, such as the scholastic records exemption at subdivision
A.3. and the medical records exemption at subdivision A. 5. Neither
the exemption within FOIA at subdivision A. 13. of §
2.1-342.01 for records of active investigations of a health
regulatory board, nor the prohibition against disclosure of records
relating to investigations or disciplinary proceedings at §
54.1-2400.2, includes such a provision.
In conclusion, the General Assembly has clearly shown its intent
that the subject of an investigation by a health regulatory board
does not have a right of access to records of such investigations.
The General Assembly has exempted agencies that are required by law
to license individuals for the practice of a professional
occupation from the scope of PPA, and has failed to include an
affirmative right of the subject to access his own investigative
records in the exemptions from FOIA. Therefore, the records
relating to the investigation and probationary status of your
license to practice social work may be properly withheld by the
Board and the Department of Health Professions pursuant to §
54.1-2400.2.
Thank you for contacting this office. I hope that I have been of
assistance.
Sincerely,
Maria J.K. Everett
Executive Director
|