|
December 22 , 2004
Michael T. Crehan
Vienna, Virginia 22182
The staff of the Freedom of
Information Advisory Council is authorized to issue advisory
opinions. The ensuing staff advisory opinion is based solely upon
the information presented in your letter of November 18, 2004.
Dear Mr. Crehan:
You have asked for an advisory opinion concerning the following
two questions: (1) whether the Virginia Board of Bar Examiners (the
Board) must disclose your score on the Multistate Bar Examination
(MBE) to you, and (2) whether the Board must disclose to you a list
of bar examination score results for all February 2004 applicants
from which all personally identifying information has been
redacted. As background information, each state has its own bar
examination used to license attorneys to practice law. The Virginia
Bar Examination is comprised of (1) an essay section on Virginia
law, and (2) the Multistate Bar Examination, which is a multiple
choice section used by many states in determining suitability to
practice law. Some states allow the transfer of the MBE score from
a prior exam in a different state, without requiring an applicant
to re-take the MBE. Whether this transfer is allowed often depends
upon how well the applicant scored on the MBE.
You indicate that you first requested that the Board provide you
with your score on the MBE. The Board denied this request, citing
its authority under § 54.1-108 of the Code of Virginia and on
the basis of a Board determination "that it is not appropriate to
make [MBE] scores available to applicants who have passed the
examination." The Board included a form to be used if you wanted to
transfer your MBE score to another jurisdiction, or if you needed
to know whether your MBE score was high enough to waive into
another jurisdiction. You subsequently requested a list of
aggregated February 2004 applicants' MBE and corresponding Virginia
essay scaled scores that did not identify individual names or other
personally identifiable information. This request was also denied
by the Board pursuant to § 54.1-108(2). You further requested
documentation of the Board's policy regarding the release of
scores. The Board replied that they could not provide this
information within the five working day limit of FOIA because the
requested documents "may be more than 20 years old and/or may no
longer exist."
Subdivision 2 of § 54.1-108 provides an exception to FOIA's
mandatory disclosure requirements for the scoring records
maintained by any board or by the Departments on individual
licensees or applicants. Section 54.1-108 further provides that
this material may be made available during normal working hours for
copying by the subject individual at his expense at the office of
the Department or board which possesses the material. The plain
language of this section indicates that the Board is allowed but
not required to provide an applicant with records of his or her own
examination results. Whether the results sought are those from the
Virginia essay portion of the examination or the MBE scores, or
both, is irrelevant. Thus, the answer to your first question is
that the Board has the discretion to choose whether or not to
release your scores to you. It appears that the Board has chosen to
exercise that discretion by refusing to release your scores. The
Board has not violated the provisions of FOIA by that exercise. You
indicate that you feel that the Board has abused its discretion.
The question of whether the Board has abused its discretion is
beyond the statutory authority of this office, as "abuse of
discretion" is a legal standard outside the scope of FOIA.
In regard to your second question concerning the release of
scores of other applicants, the exemption from release of scoring
records provided by § 54.1-108 makes no reference to
personally identifiable information. Whether such information is
redacted from a list does not affect the legal discretion given to
the Board. You argue that "a set of scores with no names is not the
'scores of individual licensees' because it would be impossible to
tell what any individual scored." Section 54.1-3922 requires the
Board to do, or cause to be done, all things it considers
necessary, convenient or expedient in connection with the
preparation, conduct and grading of examinations, in determining
the qualifications of applicants, in determining requirements for
taking and passing examinations, and in granting such certificates
to practice law as may be authorized by the Supreme Court. The
Board may promulgate rules and regulations to aid in the exercise
of its authority and in the discharge of its duties.
Considering this broad grant of authority coupled with the
exemption provided by § 54.1-108, it is the opinion of this
office that the Board retains the discretion whether or not to
release scoring records regardless of whether those records are in
an aggregated form or contain personally identifiable
information.
Thank you for contacting this office. I hope that I have been of
assistance.
Sincerely,
Maria J.K. Everett
Executive Director
|