|
September 22, 2003
Ms. Betty Ostergren
Mechanicsville, Virginia
The staff of the
Freedom of Information Advisory Council is authorized to issue
advisory opinions. The ensuing staff advisory opinion is based
solely upon the information presented in your e-mail of August 20,
2003.
Dear Ms.
Ostergren:
You have asked questions
concerning a meeting of the Board of Game and Inland Fisheries
("the Board") under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA).
You indicate that you
requested notice of all meetings of the Board, and that you
received the following notice via the U.S. Mail:
Meeting Notice
Board of Game and Inland Fisheries
4016 West Broad Street
Richmond, Virginia
August 20, 2003
Board Chairman Hoffler
will meet with the two recently appointed members of the Board for
an orientation session. This meeting will not affect the already
scheduled August 21, 2003 Board of Game and Inland Fisheries
meeting that will be held in Richmond, beginning at 9:00
a.m.
Upon receiving this
notice, you indicate that you inquired as to a more specific
location of the meeting, such as a room number, as well as the time
that the orientation meeting was scheduled on August 20, 2003. You
also asked if an agenda was available for either of the meetings,
whether agenda materials would be made available for public
inspection for the August 20 meeting, and whether public comment
would be received at either meeting. You indicate that you were
directed to the Commonwealth Calendar, which indicated that the
August 20 meeting would convene at 12:00 p.m., but did not receive
an answer about whether public comment would be received. You
further indicate that you were told that there was no formal agenda
for the August 20 meeting, as it was just a new member orientation.
You indicate that when you attended the meeting, an agenda was
available and that you were provided with a copy. You ask if the
notice of the meeting was deficient under FOIA.
Subsection A of §
2.2-3707 of the Code of Virginia requires that [a]ll meetings of
public bodies be open, except as provided in §
2.2-3711. Subsection C of §
2.2-3707 requires that [e]very public body shall give notice of
the date, time, and location of its meetings and that [n]otices for
meetings of state public bodies on which there is at least one
member appointed by the Governor shall state whether or not public
comment will be received at the meeting and, if so, the approximate
point during the meeting when public comment will be
received. Subsection E of §
2.2-3707 states that [a]ny person may annually file a written
request for notification with a public body. . . [t]he public body
receiving such request shall provide notice of all meetings
directly to each such person. Finally,
while there is no requirement that a public body create an agenda
for a meeting, subsection F of § 2.2-3707 requires that
[a]t least one copy of all agenda packets and, unless exempt,
all materials furnished to members of a public body for a meeting
shall be made available for public inspection at the same time such
documents are furnished to the members of the public
body.
As noted above, subsection
C of § 2.2-3707 requires that a meeting notice must contain
the date, time and location of the meeting. If any of these three
elements are lacking from either the notice posted generally or the
notice provided directly to individuals who request it, then notice
of the meeting would be insufficient. It appears that in this
instance, you were provided with the date and location of the
August 20 meeting, but not the time. In addition to the requirement
to include the date, time, and location on a meeting notice, if the
Governor appoints a member of the public body, a sufficient notice
must also indicate whether public comment will be received, and at
approximately what point during the meeting this will
occur.
You also raise a question
about the availability of an agenda in the facts you provided. FOIA
does not require that an agenda be created for a meeting.
Therefore, failure to provide you a copy of the agenda when you
requested it is not necessarily a violation of the law if no such
record existed at the time of your request. It is possible that an
agenda was created after your request, in which case FOIA simply
requires that the agenda be available for public inspection at the
same time it was made available to the members of the public body.
FOIA does not, however, require a public body to honor a standing
request for records that do not currently exist, but may be created
at some later time.
Thank you for contacting
this office. I hope that I have been of assistance.
Sincerely,
Maria J.K. Everett
|