|
ADMINISTRATION OF THE GOVERNMENT GENERALLY - VIRGINIA FREEDOM OF
INFORMATION ACT. HEALTH - HEALTH CARE PLANNING. MEETINGS BETWEEN
PRIVATE PARTY AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD SUBJECT
TO ACT, BUT NOT MEETINGS WITH STAFF OF DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL
SERVICES. APPOINTEES TO BOARD MAY NOT DESIGNATE ALTERNATE.
August 30, 1986
The Honorable John G. Dicks, III
Member, House of Delegates
86-87 30
You ask for my opinion on two issues. First, you ask whether
meetings between the Virginia Association of Volunteer Rescue Squads,
Inc. (the "Association"), a private organization, and either the
Division of Emergency Medical Services (the "Division"), a State
agency, or the Emergency Medical Services Advisory Board (the
"Board"), a State advisory board, are required to be open to the
public. Second, you ask whether an individual appointed by the
Governor to the Board as a representative of the Association may have
an alternate designated by the Association attend, and vote at, the
Board meetings when he is unable to attend.
I. Relevant Statutes
The Virginia Freedom of Information Act, §2.1-340 et seq. of
the Code of Virginia (the "Act"), requires that, except as otherwise
provided by law, all meetings of public bodies shall be open to the
public. See §2.1-343. The term "meetings" is defined, in
pertinent part, by §2.1-341(a) as
meetings, when sitting as a body or entity, or as an
informal assemblage of (i) as many as three members, or (ii) a
quorum, if less than three, of the constituent membership . . . of
any legislative body, authority, board, bureau, commission,
district or agency of the Commonwealth . . . .
Under the Act, therefore, a "meeting" is a gathering of
"constituent members" of a legally constituted public or governmental
body. The term does not include a gathering of employees of the
Commonwealth, even if the latter are employed by the same agency. See
Roanoke School
Bd. v. Times-World, 226 Va. 185 , 307 S.E.2 d 256 (1983);
1981-1982 Report
of the Attorney General at 437.
II. Meetings with Three or More Members of Board Must Be Open to
Public; Meetings with Employees May Be Closed
To the extent your first inquiry relates to a meeting between the
Association and three or more members of the Board, such a meeting,
even if intended to be an informal gathering, clearly would be
subject to the Act since the Board is a public body created pursuant
to §32.1-114, and the gathering would qualify as a "meeting"
under §2.1-341(a). As a result, the meeting would have to be
open to the public unless it had expressly been closed in accordance
with the conditions and procedures set forth in §§2.1-343
and 2.1-344 of the Act.
If, however, the Association members meet with a group of
officials or staff of the Division who are employees of the Virginia
Department of Health and not appointees or "constituent members" of a
public body, it is my opinion that such a meeting is not subject to
the Act.
III. Appointment of Alternate to Attend Meetings Not Permitted
Members of the Board are appointed by the Governor pursuant to
§32.1- 114. Although appointments from the groups listed therein
usually are made from lists of nominees submitted by those
organizations, the Governor appoints a named individual, not a group,
to any vacancy which exists. A commission is issued to the person
appointed. There is no authority to permit either the appointee or
the group represented by the appointee to designate an alternate to
attend or vote in the appointee's stead. Accordingly, your second
question must be answered in the negative.
|