|
March 2, 1973
THE HONORABLE E. P. HOLMES
Admiral, USN (Ret.) Executive Director, Virginia Port Authority
72-73 497
This is in response to your recent letter wherein you inquire if
the use of a mail ballot to determine a course of action is
prohibited by the Virginia Freedom of Information Act and whether an
open public vote at the next ensuing meeting of the Board of
Commissioners of the Virginia Port Authority, confirming the ballot,
would satisfy the requirements of the Act.
Pursuant to §62.1-135(g) and (h) of the Code of Virginia
(1950), as amended, the Authority has the power to adopt reasonable
regulations governing the transaction of its business. On the
assumption that the course of action to be determined is a routine or
administrative one, the use of such ballot would not be proscribed by
the Virginia Freedom of Information Act. The Act could not, of
course, be circumvented by the utilization of mail ballots in lieu of
public meetings, to conduct important or substantial business of the
Board. Additionally, pursuant to §2.1-342, the letter ballots
would, of course, be open for public inspection.
With the provisos as stated above, an open public vote at the next
ensuing meeting of the Board confirming the action taken by mail
ballot would satisfy the requirements of the Act.
It may also be of interest to you that §62.1-130 provides for
the delegation to the Executive Director of the Authority of certain
powers and duties, which powers and duties might reasonably encompass
routine or administrative actions.
|