|
Attorney General's Opinion 1969-70 #316 |
|
|
|
June 19, 1970
HONORABLE STANFORD E. PARRIS
Member, House of Delegates
69-70 316
This is in reply to your inquiry of June 15, 1970, as to the
propriety of the Fairfax County Park Authority barring the press from
a meeting held to consider the desirability and feasibility of
acquiring a tract of land for use as a public park.
The Virginia Freedom of Information Act imposes limitations on the
extent to which closed meetings may be held by certain public bodies.
These public bodies are specified in § 2.1-341(a) of the Code of
Virginia (1950), as amended. They are as follows:
". . . any authority, board, bureau, commission, district
or agency of the state or of any political subdivision of the
state, including cities, towns and counties; municipal councils,
governing bodies of counties, school boards and planning
commissions; and other organizations, corporations or agencies in
the state, supported wholly or principally by public funds."
In light of the broad language quoted above, I am of the opinion
that the meetings of the Park Authority are subject to the
limitations imposed by the Act. The instances in which closed
meetings may be held by such a body are specified in § 2.1-344
of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. It reads in part:
"(a) Executive or closed meetings may be held only for
the following purposes: . . . (2) Discussion or consideration of
the condition, acquisition or use of real property for public
purpose, or of the disposition of publicly held property."
Clearly, such a meeting as you specified would be a "discussion or
consideration of the . . . acquisition . . . of real property for
public purpose. . . ." Therefore, I am of the opinion that the Park
Authority was acting in compliance with the law in holding a closed
meeting under the circumstances which you indicated.
|