|
April 23, 2002
Leslie L. Lilley, City Attorney
City of Virginia Beach
Virginia Beach, VA
The staff of the Freedom of
Information Advisory Council is authorized to issue advisory
opinions. The ensuing staff advisory opinion is based solely upon
the information presented in your letter of March 8, 2002, and our
discussions on March 29, and April 2, 2002.
Dear Mr. Lilley:
You have asked whether a public body may properly withhold
records generated during contract negotiations under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA). You advise that the records consist of
drafts, documents and internal correspondence prepared by the
public body for the purposes of negotiating with potential or
current contractors and, if released, could adversely affect the
public body's bargaining position. You state that these records
reveal your negotiating strategy and supporting rationale for
contract pricing, and other terms and conditions of the
transaction. You indicate that the correspondence exchanged during
the contract negotiations is typically between two public officials
and does not include legal review. Finally, you state that while
many of these contract negotiations are undertaken in accordance
with the Virginia Public Procurement Act (§ 2.2-4300 et seq.),
not all contracts negotiated by the public body are within the
purview of that Act.1
Section 2.2-3701 of the Code of Virginia defines public records
as all writings and recordings that consist of letters, words or
numbers, or their equivalent, set down by handwriting, typewriting,
printing, photostatting, photography, magnetic impulse, optical or
magneto-optical form, mechanical or electronic recording or other
form of data compilation, however stored, and regardless of
physical form or characteristics, prepared or owned by, or in the
possession of a public body or its officers, employees or agents in
the transaction of public business. This office has previously
opined that draft copies of public records are included within the
definition of public records.2
Subsection A of § 2.2-3704 expressly provides that,
[e]xcept as otherwise specifically provided by law, all public
records shall be open to inspection and copying by any citizens of
the Commonwealth. Therefore, unless one of the 77 record
exemptions listed in subsection A of § 2.2-3705 or a specific
statutory provision elsewhere in the Code exempts the record, it is
subject to the mandatory disclosure requirements of FOIA.
Generally, under FOIA, with the exception of scholastic,3 personnel4 and medical5 records, exemptions are not broadly
written (i.e., they do not apply to all public bodies), rather they
are specific to a named agency of government for named records of
that agency. For example, subdivision A. 33. specifically exempts
[p]ersonal information filed with the Virginia Housing
Department Authority concerning individuals who have applied for or
received loans or other housing assistance..., and subsection
A. 66. exempts [d]ocuments and other information of a
proprietary nature furnished by a supplier of charitable gaming
supplies to the Charitable Gaming Commission...
With respect to records prepared for contract negotiations, FOIA
does not contain a general exemption relating to such records. FOIA
does, however, contain a number of related exemptions, again for
specifically named agencies. Examples of these exemptions can be
found in subdivision A. 17. of § 2.2-3705, which allows the
Department of Transportation to exempt contract cost estimates
prepared for [its] confidential use, and subdivision A.
60. of § 2.2-3705, which provides a parallel exemption for
Virginia Commonwealth University. However, as noted above, there is
no applicable FOIA records exemption for political subdivisions of
the Commonwealth generally or the City of Virginia Beach in
particular.
Exemptions to the release of records can also be found elsewhere
in the Code. The Virginia Public Procurement Act (VPPA), which
governs the procurement transactions of public bodies, states at
§ 2.2-4342 that, [e]xcept as provided in this section, all
proceedings, records, contracts and other public records relating
to procurement transactions shall be open to the inspection of any
citizen, or any interested person, firm or corporation, in
accordance with the Virginia Freedom of Information Act (§
2.2-3700 et seq.). Subsection D of the same section provides
that [a]ny competitive negotiation offeror, upon request, shall
be afforded the opportunity to inspect proposal records within a
reasonable time after the evaluation and negotiations of proposals
are completed but prior to award, except in the event that the
public body decides not to accept any of the proposals and to
reopen the contract. Otherwise, proposal records shall be open to
public inspection only after award of the contract. While the
disclosure of certain procurement records is limited by the VPPA,
it does not exempt records created by a public body related to the
negotiation of contract terms and conditions. Accordingly, these
records must be disclosed, if requested.
While disclosure of the records you describe is likely to impact
the bargaining position of the City, FOIA requires disclosure
absent an exemption. The rules of statutory construction mandate
that we examine the language of § 2.2-3700 in its entirety and
determine the intent of the General Assembly from the words
contained in the statute.6 When
the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, we are bound by
the plain meaning of that language.7 Here again, FOIA ensures citizen
access to records in the custody of public officials and presumes
public records are open unless there is an exemption.8 The exemptions must be narrowly
construed as required by FOIA. Despite the potential adverse effect
on the public body's bargaining position, FOIA's mandatory
disclosure requirements imposed upon these contract negotiation
records must prevail. This office is tasked with opining on the
requirements of the current law, not what the law should be.
Perhaps this is an issue that should be addressed by the General
Assembly.
In conclusion, FOIA neither provides a general exemption for
records generated during contract negotiations or a specific
exemption for the City of Virginia Beach, nor does an exemption for
such records exist elsewhere in the Code. Without an exemption, the
record must be disclosed.
Thank you for contacting this office. I hope that I have been of
assistance.
Sincerely,
Maria J.K. Everett
Executive Director
1. § 2.2-4343
2. Virginia Freedom of
Information Advisory Opinion 3 (2000).
3. Subdivision A. 3. of § 2.2-3705.
4. Subdivision A. 4. of § 2.2-3705.
5. Subdivision A. 5. of § 2.2-3705.
6. Cummings v. Fulghum, 261 Va. 73, 540
S.E.2d at 494 (2001).
7. Id at 77.
8. Subsection B of § 2.2-3700.
|