|
June 22, 2001
Mr. Michael Cook
Woodstock, Virginia
The staff of the Freedom of
Information Advisory Council is authorized to issue advisory
opinions. The ensuing staff advisory opinion is based solely upon
the information presented in your phone conversation of May 23,
2001.
Dear Mr. Cook:
You have asked a question concerning a reporter's attempt to
make an annual request to be provided with certain public records
under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The reporter
made a written request to be notified of all meetings of the New
Market Town Council, as is allowed by subsection E of §
2.1-343 of the Code of Virginia, and in the same letter made an
annual request to be provided with copies of public records
relating to town council business as they became available
throughout the year. Specifically, the reporter requested that she
be provided throughout the year with "copies of all packets, memos
and other written communications given to members for these
meetings and any other memos or documents dealing with any other
public business or any other memos or documents provided to members
at the same time those members are provided the documentation." You
ask whether the town must honor this standing request each time new
public documents are sent to town council members, or whether the
town may require the reporter to make a new request each time she
desires to see public records. If you are required to honor this
standing request for documents, you ask whether you would still
have five days from the receipt or creation of the records to
respond, or whether the five-day response time set forth in
subsection B of § 2.1-342 of Virginia is negated by the annual
request.
FOIA does allow a person to request notice of all meetings of a
public body. Subsection E of § 2.1-343 states that [a]ny
person may annually file a written request for notification with a
public body...The public body receiving such a request shall
provide notice of all meetings directly to each such person.
However, there is no corollary in the public records section of
FOIA allowing for a standing request for access to public
documents.
The Attorney General of Virginia addressed a question similar to
the one that you present, and opined that FOIA does not authorize a
person to make a continuing request for public records that are not
in existence at the time the request is made.1 That opinion addressed a situation in which a
well driller requested copies of all applications for well permits
that would be filed with the Department of Health in the future.
The Attorney General relied on the portion of the definition of a
public record that defined public records as those prepared,
owned or in the possession of a public body.2 Furthermore, the Attorney General noted that
FOIA requires that all requested records be provided within five
days of the request, and if a record does not exist at the time it
is requested, it would be impossible to adhere to this requirement.
Finally, the Attorney General reasoned that while the General
Assembly authorized individuals to make a request for continual
notice of meetings, it did not authorize a similar request for
documents.
In light of this opinion, FOIA does not require that the Town of
New Market adhere to the reporter's standing request for copies of
packets to be provided to members at future meetings or for copies
of other memos or documents relating to public business provided to
members during the course of the year. As such, you could require
the reporter to make a new request every time she wishes to obtain
town council records. However, I suggest that it may be
administratively less burdensome to make arrangements with the
reporter to send her a copy of the agenda packet, and any other
documents that the public body anticipates that she will request,
at the same time that the town council staff sends packets or other
documents to the members. This would perhaps save the
administrative time and costs that would be associated with
responding to what would likely be numerous individual requests for
documents. If the town council does not wish to reach such an
agreement, subsection F of § 2.1-343 requires that [a]t
least one copy of all agenda packets and, unless exempt, all
materials furnished to members of a public body for a meeting shall
be made available for public inspection at the same time
such documents are furnished to the public body. (Emphasis
added) The town council would have five days, pursuant to
subsection B of § 2.1-342, to respond to any other requests
for public documents.
Thank you for contacting this office. I hope that I have been of
assistance.
Sincerely,
Maria J.K. Everett
Executive Director
Footnotes:
1. 1991 Op. Atty. Gen. Va.
7.
2. At the time of the Attorney General's
Opinion, FOIA referred to "official records" instead of "public
records." However, the definition relied on by the Attorney General
remains the same, despite the name change.
|